The public support / content of this page has been recreated at The H600 Project starting in early 2016. This after being first moved to WorldFamilies in the last half of 2015. Please see The H600 Project for updates and information. The below is deprecated and likely to disappear. This was the first branch study and, after experience with this effort, lessons learned are being imported back to this site for other branches. This page was created in 2011 and the last real edit in late 2014 when focus began to shift to WorldFamilies and such.
Hore / Hoar / Hoare Surname and DNA Project
including variants Hoard, Hor, Horr, and Hord
and recent North America variants Harr, Hobart, Howard and Shorr,
and (older) English variants Hora, Hoor, Hoore, Horre, le Hore
along with missing 'H' variants of Oar, Orr, and Ore
Due to the large page, click on a the '[+]' or '[-]' symbol to expand or collapse a major section. Subsection links in the outline to the right work only after an enclosing major section is expanded in this way.
Dedicated to those hitting a dead-end in their genealogical research by helping them learn about some common surname lines, surname name changes, as well as utilizing Y-DNA-STR testing to get a strong hint as to the family lineage (on the male, surname line).
Due to historic reasons, there has been a focus on New England / North American lines that are 300+ years old. But as more participation comes, many more recent immigrant lines are being identified. The common origin of the surname is mostly Southwest England with some Irish and Southeast and Southcentral England lines as well.
Introduction
The surname is most commonly found in Southwest England. Specifically historic county names of Gloucestershire, Bristol, Wiltshire, Somerset, Dorset, Devon, and Cornwall (ref?). Some lines also from Ireland although it is not clear which is the older, more original location of the surname use.
We have included the
Hord's, most commonly associated with Virginia and South Carolina, as early DNA results are showing a close association with the early English and Irish lines already being covered here.
The surnames
Hoare and
Hore are almost exclusive to Southern England and, at most, recent emigrants from there (last 200 years).
Hoar appears more exclusive to North America and seems to have been
Hore back in England.
Hoar was commonly changed to
Horr and
Hoard in North America in the 1700's and from
Horr to
Harr in 1900.
Hobart and
Howard were more unique, isolated changes of the name in the 1700 and 1800's as well.
The Surname
We started the project based on the surname used upon immigration to the New England area in the 1600's of two lines. Hezekiah Hoar, a Puritan, from Devon, England who settled (in) Taunton, Massachusetts; and Charles Hoar's family from Gloucester, England arriving a little later into Sudbury, Massachusetts (see "English Origins of New England Families, 2nd Series: from the NEHGR", Volume II (of III), PAGE 377).
Researchers into both families claim the name in England was Hoar in the 1600's but (le) Hore earlier back to the 1300's in Wales and bordering Southwest England areas. More recent population studies and genealogical DNA testing performed is indicating the origin of (some of) the families is likely the Ui Niell clan of Ulster (now Northern Ireland) from the 500-800 A.D. era. Otherwise, previous research indicates the surname links to a William le Hore b.~1100 and one of the Norman invaders into Southern England.
Hoarfrost example
The origin of the surname varies depending on who you talk too. But the lore given by Norton Horr in his 1907 book fits best for this author. The claim there is that the name relates to the usage in the Old English language of the word
hor meaning ancient or a form of grayish, off-white color — somewhere between pewter and a grayish, not clear, ice. Hence the term Hoar Frost to talk of the light icing in the morning. Or even possibly the term Hoar Fog in Scotland to talk of the eastern shore fog that forms off shore and blows in — very similar to that found in San Francisco. There is even a further claim that the use came from "hor" markers used to designate boundaries and roads. These stone markers grayed over time. The marks in early sundials bore this name as a result. And thus the origin of the words Hour and Year it seems. But why the color grey/white a significance? Norton's book, the authors family, and reports on some related families in the 1800's all indicate that members of this line go prematurely grey and remain so for many years (with no hair loss). And hence the surname given. Others try and tie the name to an area in England that went by
Hor and hence the early name version of
le Hore.
As for pronunciation, some claim the English name was pronounced more like Oar; with a silent H. The pronunciation in the Colonies was likely similar to Door but using a clearly pronounced 'H'. Thus the probable cause of so many name changes in the early years due to the similarity to "Whore" and its colloquial usage in North American English. Hore and Hoare are variations strongest still in England.
Once in the Colonies
Starting in 1630's Massachusetts, two major families arrive which have Hoar as the spelling. Shortly after, variations begin. We see Hoard, Horr, and Hor emerging as common changes. In the last 100 years, we see Harr, Shorr, Hobart, and Howard as well.
The change from Hoar to Hoard and Horr were common ones in the 1700's. We understand some continued to pronounce the name to rhyme with Door. But we also hear a pronunciation came into use more like Haw. Thus likely explaining some records written as Harr in the 1800's and many permanently changing the spelling to Harr around 1900 when written, vital records became enforced in North America. A pronunciation like Haw makes sense when you couple this with New England accents (specifically central Boston) that pronounce R's like W's.
The most extensive research found so far seems to be centered in North America and around the arrival of a family or individual into the New World. As awareness and knowledge is gained, likely more family lines, especially ones still in England, will be discovered or refined.
Surname Mailing Lists & Bulletin Boards
- Rootsweb.com: Harr, Hoar, Hoard, Hoare, Hobart, Hord, Horr
- Genealogy.com: Harr, Hoar, Hoard, Hoare, Hobart, Horr
Click the
'[+]' below the family LINE indicated to see its details. Following the known family research is a large section on DNA testing and how it relates into helping link into the known families given here.
English Lines
We should note that several Hoar lines of Devon lay claim to the Rigsford Manor connection and even a William le Hore, Norman invader. But then claim different ancestors attached to these locations or original people. Meaning, are really different lines but co-opt their stories to be their own. Something that needs to be clarified; possibly with the DNA project results assisting in disambiguating the mix of information.
Books and Articles Published
- Hoare, Edward, Some account of the early history and genealogy, with pedigrees from 1330, unbroken to the present time, of the families of Hore and Hoare, 1883, A.R. Smith, London (Archive.org)
- Claims to tie in both Hezekiah and Charles Hoare lines of New England in 1600's. Research source of many others pre-emigration study on these lines.
- Links to Devon(shire) which includes Chagford village and Rushford Manor just north of it. Both New England Hoar lines claim lineage to this area. Also see Devon Index.
- Long story attached to John Hore b.1552 profile that is part of tree fragment
Researchers (current)
Researcher | GenDB | Website | Lineage
|
Malcom Hoare | | Website | (Traces to same Charles Hoar family from Gloucester that went to New England)
|
Shona Hore | Tree | Web | (Traces to John Hore of Devon, b1552)
|
Nancy Orr | Geni | | (Traces to John Hore of Devon b.1552)
|
Fraser Hore | | | (Traces to William Hore of Devon b160x and William le Hore b1154 before that) |
North American Lines
Much credit must be given to Roz Edson's all inclusive attempt to capture names and facts of Horr or Hoar surname lineage in North America. Her
Rootsweb database of eighty thousand plus people is a testament to how the name was changed so often in the last three hundred years or more. As well as it documents the major and minor lines that have been researched along with the thousands of still isolated family lines that need to be linked in yet. We have as yet to discover a similar database covering U.K.-based research; if it exists.
Hezekiah Hoar (Hore) and Rebekah xxx (MA)
[+]
One of the major sources of the name in North America. A puritan family in the great migration. Some descendants are still following the congregationalist path (now often Universalist or Methodist). From Devon, England to Taunton, MA in 1633 on ship Recovery.
Books and Articles published
A majority of the online trees going back to as early as 1300 have simply copied the below two works. There are errors and much is unsourced, but it is a starting basis. Would be nice to have a record of the starting point and then sourced corrections added to it.
- Horr, Norton Townshend.; A Record of Descendants of Hezekiah Hoar of Taunton, Massachusetts with an Historical Introduction, 1907, Cleveland, Ohio, privately published, 56pp
- Archive.org scan from Boston Public Library copy. Noted as being Author's copy. Includes hand corrected errata and updates in the original pages and an additional bound-in 100 numbered pages of notes, errata, additions,collected signatures and further research. Also inserted in back some personal correspondence and photos. B&W optimized version for laser printers and enhanced Table of Contents of this author's copy created locally and available here.
- Family History Library, Salt Lake City. With a letter from William Spencer Horr dated May, 1934 indicating a later re-publication and clean-up.
- Hoar, Lyon J., The English Ancestry of Hezekiah Hoar of Taunton, Mass., New England Historical and Genealogical Record (NEGHR), 1987 (Num 141, 144, 145)
- Smallbone, Ken, The English Ancestry of Hezekiah Hoar of Taunton, Massachusetts, Part II: Proof of Medieval Ancestry Through Evidence of a Seal, 1990, NEHGR
- Hoard, Lyon J, The Ancestry of William Hoar of Chester, Vermont, 1988, NEHGR
- Bradner, Frank W., Horr (Hoar) genealogy : the descendants of Elijah Horr & Anna Paddock, 2003, Book in FHL
- Horr, Edward Weed, Family Bible of Edward Weed Horr and Janie T. Rodman, 1963, Microfilm at FHL
- Horr, Edward Weed, Journal of E. W. Horr, 1963, Microfilm at FHL
- Horr, Edward Weed, and McGee, Juliette, Vital statistics : never before published records of far western Kentucky, records compiled over a half century by E.W. Horr, 1977, Riverfolk Publishing, Book at FHL
Minor sections in larger history books:
- Duis, E. The good old times in McLean County, Illinois : containing two hundred and sixty-one sketches of old settlers, a complete historical sketch of the Black Hawk war and descriptions of all matters of interest relating to McLean County, 1874 (archive.org) (specifically check out the sketch on Josiah Horr on pages 750-751)
- History of Vermilion County, together with historic notes on the Northwest, gleaned from early authors, old maps and manuscripts, private and official correspondence, and other authentic, though, for the most part, out-of-the-way sources, 1879 (archive.org) (specifically, check out write-up by Matilda or Nancy Horr, or their descendent, on pages 670-674)
- Check out the Great Migration Project that is part of the New England Historic Genealogical Society (NEHGS). Collected many of the published works on Hezekiah from the NEHGR together. Requires paid membership or library with such to access online database. See also hardbound book series, volume III specifically, entitled The Great Migration: Immigrants to New England, Series 2.
Researchers (current)
Name | GenDB | Website | Lineage
|
Roz Edson | DB | Site (old) | Joseph Horr6, John Horr5, Philip Horr4, Isaac Hoar3, Nathaniel Hoar2, Hezekiah Hoar1
|
Joyce Selix | DB | Site1, Site2 | Warren Horr6, Robert Hoar5, Robert Hoar4, Samuel Hoar3, Nathaniel Hoar2, Hezekiah Hoar1
|
Sandra Hoard | DB | Site (Archive) | Edward Hoard6, Edward Hoard5, Isaac Hoard4, Edward Hoar3, Hezekiah Hoar2, Hezekiah Hoar1
|
Gordon Hoard | | | Parda Hoard6, Pardee Hoard5, Simeon Hoard4, Edward Hoar3, Hezekiah Hoar2, Hezekiah Hoar1
|
Rowena Horr | DB | | Robert Hor6, Robert Hoar5, Robert Hoar4, Samuel Hoar3 Nathaniel Hoar2, Hezekiah Hoar1
|
David Agee Horr | | | Robert Hor6, Robert Hoar5, Robert Hoar4, Samuel Hoar3 Nathaniel Hoar2, Hezekiah Hoar1
|
Randy Harr | MyCuz,:::::.us/" rel="external">DB | MyCuz,:::::.us/" rel="external">Site | Robert Hor6, Robert Hoar5, Robert Hoar4, Samuel Hoar3 Nathaniel Hoar2, Hezekiah Hoar1
|
Donna Jaster | DB | | Robert Hor6, Robert Hoar5, Robert Hoar4, Samuel Hoar3 Nathaniel Hoar2, Hezekiah Hoar1
|
Charlotte Jack | | Site | Calvin Hoard6, Hezekiah Hoar5, William Hoar4, Hezekiah Hoar3, Hezekiah Hoar2, Hezekiah Hoar1
|
Ronna Roberts | DB, Alt | | Benjamin Warren Horr6, Peter Horr5, William Hoar4, Samuel Hoar3, Nathaniel Hoar2, Hezekiah Hoar1 |
Researchers (historic)
Name | Website | Lineage
|
Norton Townsend Horr | | Roswell Horr6, John Hoar5, Elijah Hoar4, Jonathan Hoar3, Nathaniel Hoar2, Hezekiah Hoar1
|
Lyon Jackson Hoard | Site | Alonzo Hoard6, John Hoar5, William Hoar4, Hezekiah Hoar3, Hezekiah Hoar2, Hezekiah Hoar1 |
Charles Hoar (Hoare) and Joanna Hinksman (MA)
[+]
Descendants you will read much about include Samuel Hoar and sons George Frisbee Hoar and Ebernezer Rockwood Hoar. Charles died in England. Widow and children came in 16xx from Gloucester, England to Sudbury MA.
Books and Articles published
- Nourse, Henry Stedman. The Hoar family in America and its English ancestry: a compilation from collections made by the Hon. George Frisbie Hoar, 1899, Boston, Massachusetts, D. Clapp and Son, (as reprinted in the New England Historical and Genealogical Register on January, April, and July, 1899), 36pp (FHL, excerpted), Archive.org
- Hobart, Edgar, Hoar- Hobart Genealogy: From the collection of Edgar Hobart, as copied by the San Francisco chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution in 1952, 37pp (FHL) (PDF available)
- Storey, Moorefield and Emerson, Edward Waldo. Ebernezer Rockwood Hoar: A Memoir 1911, Houghton Mifflin Cambridge Mass, 360pp (Archive.org, Google ebook, excerpts)
- Hale, Edward Everett, George F. Hoar, 1907, (archive.org)
- Hudson, Woodward, Memoir of Samuel Hoar: September 27, 1845-April 11, 1904, 1906, Archive.org
- Hoar, George Frisbie, Autobiography of Seventy Years: Vol 1, 1905, New York, New York, Charles Scribner's Sons, (Google ebook)
- Horr, William S., Branches of a Family Tree: the hoar ancestry (about George Whitfield Hoar), 1985, Tangled Roots, Vancouver, Canada (FHL) (PDF available)
- Hoar, Alfred Wyman, Lineage and Family Records of Alfred Wyman Hoar and his wife Josephine Jackson, 1898, Monticello, Minn (Archive.org)
- Hobart, Michael L, The descendants of Martin (Hoar) Hobart and Paulina Parks, 1996, Book in FHL
- Lawson, Mary Lewis, Descendants of Richard Hoar, 2001, Book in FHL
- Thoresen, Elsie L, The Hoar/Hoare family, 1999, Collection on FHL (online)
- Roberts, Gary Boyd, English Origins of New England Families, 2nd Series: from the New England Historical and Genealogical Record, Volume II (of III), 1985, page 377
- Unitarian and Universalist History: Ebenezer Rockwood Hoar (1816-1895), Elizabeth Hoar (1814-1878), George Frisbie Hoar (1826-1904), Samuel Hoar (1778-1856)
Researchers (current)
Researcher | GenDB | Website | Lineage
|
Michael Hobart | | Website | Samuel Hoar6, Joseph Hoar5. Leanard Hoar4, Daniel Hoar3, John Hoar2, Charles Hoar1
|
Timothy Peterman | | | Jonathan Hoar6, Josiah Hoar5, John Hoar4, Daniel Hoar3, John Hoar2, Charles Hoar1
|
Linda Thompson | GenDB | |
|
Jim Retson | GenDB | Website |
|
Michele Daniels | GenDB | WebBlog | David Hoar6, David Hoar5, Leanard Hoar4, Daniel Hoar3, John Hoar2, Charles Hoar1 |
John Hord (Hoard, Hore) and Jane Jeane (VA)
[+]
Born Surrey, England in 1664/1679 and arrived Virginia by 1702 but likely in 1685 as an indentured servant. Not believed related into the surnames looked at here but often confused and cited along with these families. Added into DNA project to prove definitively. Also seen as
Hoard and
Hore sometimes. Supposedly related to an Alan Hord, arrived VA 1650 and Elias Hord, arrived VA in 1654. From Surrey, England to Shady Grove, Essex County, VA around 1685.
Note: there is a John Hurd in Connecticut about 1640 who is from the same area in Southwest England. Variations on their name are Heard, Horde, Hourd, Hoord, Hird, Herd, and Hord and thus very closely overlapping with names here. The project is not considered expanded into this surname unless DNA testing begins to show the surnames are truly related. See Hurd Family History for an introduction to this surname.
Books
- Hord, Arnold Harris, Genealogy of the Hord family, 1898
- Hord, Arnold Harris, Thomas Hord, gentleman: born in England, 1701, died in Virginia, 1766; a supplement to the Genealogy of the Hord family, 1903
- Hord, Arnold Harris, The Hord family of Virginia : a supplement to the Genealogy of the Hord family, 1915
- Hord, Arnold Harris, English ancestry of the Hord family of Virginia : with supplementary data, 1941 (WorldCat)
Researchers
Researcher | GenDB | Website | Lineage
|
J. Mark Hord | DB | Site | John Thornton9, Forrest8, Francis Thornton7, Francis Triplett6, Thornton5, Elias4, Jesse3, Thomas2, John1
|
Christina Henry | DB | | |
Uncategorized or less researched lines
- William Hoar (Bristol, Rhode Island, ~1743 or possibly Salem/Boston, MA ~1659; mentioned in Norton Horr's intro section)
DNA Technology for Genealogy
We first provide links to projects and service providers before following up with a backgrounder to explain this all.
DNA Surname Projects
[-]
Amazingly, going hand-in-hand with historical surname progression through the male line, there are genetic markers in the Y-chromosome that remain unchanged, for the most part. So Y-DNA testing becomes a great way to help identify which surname line a male belongs to if unsure. Or to verify that the believed surname line is correct.
Interestingly, there is a similar DNA marker test for maternal-only lines. Like for Y-DNA, a mitochondrial DNA (or mtDNA for short) marker test can be performed to see if two people are from the same maternal lineage. Unfortunately, there is no similar surname progression to more easily track this line and thus make it as popular and used. Also, the markers in mtDNA are far fewer and change infrequently, thus making them near useless in near-term (<500 years) genealogical studies.
For both tests, as one goes back just a few generations, the portion of ones ancestors from these two restricted lines becomes a very small part of ones overall pedigree. So Y-DNA and mtDNA testing is helpful in only a very limited portion of your ancestry. But as Y-DNA tracks directly with West European surname usage and custom, this has become a key addition to surname project research like covered here.
Surname | FTDNA / WorldFam | Other | Notes
|
Hoar(e), Horr, Hoard | Hoar | | Hoar et al Surname
|
Hord | Hord | | John Hord family plantation (but matching the Hoar project DNA)
|
Hurd, Heard | Heard | | Hurd/Heard line but subset has strong match to some in Hoar
|
Howard | Howard | | A recent name that some Hoars officially changed too. Many direct DNA matches between this Howard surname project and the Hoar one.
|
Whitney | | Whitney | one of the largest and apparently most successful
|
Harris | | Harris | |
DNA Test Services Providers (Genealogic)
[-]
| Service | 23andMe | FamilyTreeDNA | GeneBase | AncestryDNA | AncestryByDNA | Genographic Project
|
| Affiliation | - | Owned by GeneByGene | - | Formerly GeneTree | - | National Geographic
|
| Public Search Database | - | Ysearch, MitoSearch, RSRS (for mtDNA; update of rCRS) | - | Sorenson MGF | - | -
|
STR | Y | - | Y-DNA-xx 12-110 | Paternal 20-91 | - | - | - | -
|
STR | Autosomal * | - | - | Identity (17) | - | Worldview (13) | - | -
|
SNP | Y | Yes | Indiv- Subclade | Paternal (12), Indiv- Subclade | - | Paternal Lineage | | Yes
|
SNP | mtDNA | Yes HVR1-2 | HVR1, HVR1-2, Full | HVR1, HVR1-2, 20 Coding, Full | - | Maternal Lineage (HVR) | | Yes
|
SNP | Autosomal | Yes | FamilyFinder | ? | Yes | Origins (144) | | Yes
|
SNP | X | Yes | - | - | - | - | - | Yes
|
* STR Autosomal means the 13 CODIS-identified STR markers in the 22 Autosomal Chromosomes. This test and its results are normally exclusively used for identity in forensics (law enforcement) and paternity. They are useful only within a generation or so due to the low number of markers tested. |
See the
ISOGG listing of DNA Test Companies.
Third-party analysis:
GEDMatch,
Plink,
Others
Notes
- SNP tests are traditionally used for Population Studies of groups thousands of years old and the source of Haplogroup work.
- STR tests are traditionally used for Genealogic Time finding of relatives (roughly 700 years ago to present) and most popular in Western European Surname Studies.
- Y and mtDNA are used for Paternal-only and Maternal-only line studies. Y tests can only be performed on male subjects.
- Autosomal are useful for near term (within 7 generations or so) studies of "blood" relationships between people. Because covering all chromosomes, is diluted quickly within a 4-5 generations.
- Most of these companies operate in the USA and only ship to USA or Canada. See ISOGG listing of DNA Test Companies for those that operate outside North America or specifically Shipping DNA Kits link for ways to get around the restriction.
- 23andMe, although the newest company, is by far the biggest (most SNP's tested) and most popular (most people tested). They offer all the tests for one basic price. But they promote themselves primarily as a health traits and occurrence predictor. So even though AutoSNP is included and supported, many "relatives" (close matches) do not respond to requests for collaboration on genealogy. As of 22 November, 23andMe has voluntarily stopped making their health indications results available to new customers. They still provide testing of nearly 1 million SNP's across all the DNA and allow the download of the complete results so you can do your own analysis with other resources.
- FamilyTreeDNA allows the purchase of an import kit for 23andMe's data. The import removes the need to take the FamilyTreeDNA FamilyFinder test. The import discards X, Y and mtDNA results though.
- FamilyTreeDNA and 23andMe use different SNP marker nomenclature. FamilyTreeDNA and ISOGG use a simplified naming that usually starts with a capital letter identifying the research source followed by a few digits. Their name also implies a specific change for the marker. 23andMe uses the NIH dbSNP standard nomenclature that usually starts with rs followed by many digits. They then separately give you the tested value for that marker. A mapping between the two is in the SNP Index link of each years tree at ISOGG (for example, SNP Index). Only later indices show (importantly) what the ISOGG name implies in terms of the expected nucleotide value to be viewed as a positive test for that marker.
DNA Results Analysis — Quick Summary
[+]
There are many factors that can affect the actual DNA comparison between people (assuming the tests are 100% accurate and complete). The results below are based on my experience, current scan of literature, and reasoning through the process.
Key is to understand there are averages/means and standard deviations from those averages. When a bell curve deviation pattern exists, this is often represented as a value +- standard deviation. But your value may occur anywhere in the bell curve. If the spread is based on average length of time before the next change, then the average may be, lets say, 500 years. But if yours change recently, then it throws the predictors way off.
We need to separate our discussion of autosomal SNP test comparison (maybe with X thrown in), STR results comparison, and mtDNA SNP test comparison. These are the three major tests done.
Autosomal SNP
Result: expressed as % shared DNA (sometimes presented as centiMorgan/cM of shared DNA) .
Name: Called
Family Finder in FTDNA,
DNA Relatives in 23andMe.
Lets look at the simple cases first. Full descendants (no half-siblings, no super-siblings) of the same generation. cM is a measure of the number of base pairs; with 1 million base pairs being 1 cM the most often. There are 7.4 billion base pairs in the 46 main chromosomes with each
chromosome from 50 to 250 million each.
Two siblings will share 50% of their DNA with each other, on average. It can be 100% (identical twins) or even 0% (a brother and sister who happened to get opposite chromosome strands). The standard deviation appears pretty tight on this. Working anecdotal experience is 5%.
Two first cousins, assuming they share only a set of grandparents, should share 25% of their autosomal DNA with the other cousin. But here the deviation quickly seems to jump with 20% as a more likely standard deviation from that value. Note that how much each grandkid shares with each grandparent is somewhat independent of how much each cousin may share with each other. For example, you could share 20% with a maternal grandmother and share 30% with a maternal-side cousin.
Carrying down further, you share, on average, 12.5% of your DNA with a second cousin (when share two of eight great-grandparents). And 6.25% with third cousins. And 3.13% with fourth cousins. And so on. The standard deviation tends to increase with each generation so these average values must really be specified more as a range as you get to the 5th and 6th generation. Beyond 6 generations, the likelihood of finding much shared DNA of significance is greatly diminished. Anytime you see a match of less than 1% shared in your results, generally ignore it as statistical noise unless other factors come into play.
The values above can change when half-siblings are involved in the ancestry. Also, if separated by a generation or more from another tester. Commonly referred to as "once removed", or "twice removed" and so on. Another factor is if the parents in your cousins lineage are not truly separated. For example, two brothers marry two sisters and each have offspring. Or a parent remarries a sibling of their original spouse and has more kids. In these cases, percentage shared will likely average higher.
Y-DNA STR
Result: Summarized as a genetic distance (GD). GD calculated by summing the (absolute) differences in the lengths of common markers tested. The more markers tested and the lower the GD, the higher likelihood of a close relationship. Otherwise, shown as numeric value of repeats per marker tested.
Name:
Y-STR in FTDNA.
Unlike Autosomal, this is not predicting near term relatives (within 5 generations). Instead it is used for finding male-line only common relatives in the 5 to 30 generation time frame. One should test at least 25 markers to make an accurate determination; 37 or even 67 is best. A general rule of thumb, on average, is a GD of 1 per 60 markers per 125 years (4-5 generations). Or a GD of 1 per 30 markers per 250 years (8-10 generations).
Some markers change more frequently than others. But the frequency of change also seems to vary with different groups of people (sometimes identified with common leaf SNP's for a haplogroup). So the estimation of how close two people are can be dependent on which markers changed. And the estimation is based on the average frequency of the change. If your marker changed in the near term, this can throw off the calculated prediction. So the prediction tends to be more of an upper bound.
Y-DNA SNP
Result: Often summarized as listing the markers that tested positive for a change from the reference normal. Often 20-30 markers may be reported as positive.
Name:
Deep Subclade in FTDNA, summarized in
Paternal Line for 23andMe.
There are over 50,000 identified SNP's in the Y-DNA strand alone. Only a subset are used in Haplogroup studies for male lineage. They change very rarely so they try and identify the reference or norm and then the change as a positive for that marker. So important to know (a) if there was a result of the test and (b) what the result was: normal/negative or changed/positive. A change may be a change to the other value in a nucleotide pair or possibly the addition of a repeating value (like for an STR) or the missing base pair (or short strand). Researchers try and pick the markers that seem to be the best indicators for a given population. 23andMe provides the complete list of all 50,000+ markers they test for and the results obtained (note that sometimes it reports no result which is different than normal/negative).
mtDNA SNP
Result: Summarized as listing the markers that tested positive for a change from the reference model (rCRS). Often 10 to 20 markers may be reported as positive for HRV-1 and HRV-2 combined.
Name:
mtDNA HVR1/2 in FTDNA, summarized in
Maternal Line for 23andMe.
Similar to Y-DNA SNP except on the mitochondrial DNA strand that comes from the maternal line only. But unlike the Y-chromosome, the mtDNA exists in everyone and so the maternal line can be tested in anyone. This is strand is much shorter and so often some may simply have the whole strand fully sequenced. There are only approximately 16,000 base pairs. Like for Y-DNA SNP (or SNP's in general), these changes are indicative of a population as they will not occur for 1,000's of years.
DNA Test Backgrounder
[+]
Note: rewriting this section so current in-progress, in-transition draft is shown.
What is DNA? Human cells each have 44
autosomal chromosomes grouped into 22 pairs, two sex chromosomes (X, Y or a mix) and a Mitochondrial DNA ring as well. The Y chromosome always comes from a father and exists in males only. Mitochondrial DNA always comes from the mother and exists in all children of either sex. The X chromosome may come from the father or mother and may be lumped in with the other autosomal chromosomes in test results.
The chromosomes are segmented, by definition, into genes. Chromosomes are long-stranded molecules composed of base nucleotide pairs (known as C, G, A, and T, unpaired) and attached end to end to form long chains. There are millions of pairs in a linear sequence in many chromosomes. There are inter-gene areas of chromosomes as well. In fact, there is more inter-gene nucleotide pairs than in-gene ones. Chromosomes are attached near the center to form pairs of chromosomes. We have 22 autosomal pairs and a sex-chromosome pair.
A large amount of our chromosomes are identical with other mammals. Then within humans, a large portion of our chromosomes are (near) identical to each other as well (99.9+%). Key is to find the minute differences in the chromosomes between people.
DNA Difference Testing
When we talk about
DNA Testing, we are generally talking about looking for very infrequent, small, minute differences within a gene. Often just a single nucleotide change in one base pair in a very large string of in-common nucleotides. This as opposed to full
Genetic Sequencing which determines the exact string of nucleotides in the whole gene or chromosome. The former is much easier to test but only as accurate as knowing common points of change in the gene where a particular nucleotide might be different. Note that sometimes a change may be just a base value (letter) in a pair. Or it may be the drop or addition of a base pair. More extensive changes of larger sequences of base pairs either inserted or deleted can also occur but are not usually accounted for unless full sequencing is performed.
In
DNA Testing for small differences, there are two types of changes they test for. A
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) in a specific gene. Or a lengthening or contraction of a repeating nucleotide pattern, often a
Short Tandem Repeat (STR) marker (more generally,
Microsatellites). The SNP change occurs much less frequently and so is used for long term (over thousands of years)
Population Studies. The latter (STR) change happens more frequently and thus used for shorter term (hundreds of years) genealogical studies as well as relationship testing. For genealogical study, STR's are currently only identified and tested in the Y chromosome. Autosomal STR testing has been limited to use in crime databases and does not overlap with any genealogical test mechanisms. With that said, although Y-STR testing has been strictly used for population and genealogic relationship studies, use in some criminal forensics has been proposed. See the
NIST Primer for STR testing and
Y-Chromosome Haplotype Reference Database for more information.
Y-STR
The STR string might change in length by one every so often (a mutation). These changes seem to occur more frequently than SNP changes and hence help identify family lines. On average, out of a group of 67 different such markers, a length change of one in 3-4 generations (or about 100 years) is expected (
ref). Some markers change more often than others. See the
FamilyTreeDNA STR FAQ for more information on Y-STR markers, in general.
Comparing many males over a large number of markers will allow one to characterize if and how closely in time they are related. If two tested individuals compare identically or near identically over sixty or more markers, they are likely very close in relation through their male (and often surname) lines; say 3-5 generations. If enough males are tested across enough separations (2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc cousins), then with who a Y-STR change event likely occurred among some common ancestor can be determined. Most agree at least 37 markers should be compared, at minimum, to make a reasonable assessment of being related within the past 400-500 years. Early on in the early 2000's, only 10-20 such markers were known and tested for. Ten years later there are over 110 markers to test.
A change in Y-STR marker length by one indicates a
genetic distance of one for that marker. Summing up the genetic distance of all the markers tested gives you a total distance. Generally, for genealogical-time related people, a genetic distance of 1 to 3 over 25 to 70 markers is expected (
ref). Can be more or less but roughly averages out to this. Note that a Y-STR marker can change back as well. That is, add a nucleotide one generation and remove one in a later generation so the length is back to the original. For this reason, Y-STR markers are not useful in longer term, population studies of a thousand years or more.
Note: there are some markers that seem to change in length with every generation and others that change rarely. Researchers label as useless markers that never change or too often change and only retain those that seem to change in the genealogical time frame of within 500 years but not every generation.
In our experience, CDY-b seems to be different for everyone tested and we tend to ignore it in calculating the genetic distance. There are other markers that contribute more commonly to change as well (DYS458, DYS459-a/b, DYS449, DYS464, DYS576, DYS570, and CDY-a). But any marker can change at any generation. See
Y STR Markers list and
Y-STR Comparison Table for more information.
Y-STR marker values can be a
predictor for a Haplogroup but not an accurate measurement (or standard used to define) it. For that you need SNP's tested.
Y-SNP
To understand longer-term, deeper male-line ancestry that extends beyond surnames, one uses SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) markers or tests. Instead of repeating patterns of a single nucleotide, these are identified segments of the DNA strand that do not change often and are found to have a single-nucleotide different. The strand is characterized and either you have that match (polymorphism) or not. See
Understanding Y-DNA SNP Results for more information.
SNP tests are used to define
haplogroups or populations over longer periods of time. You have to test for specific SNP's to determine if you are a member of a defined Haplogroup. These definitions are still changing as more population studies are done and more SNP's that are important identified. Often, the value of a specific SNP (or identified nucleotide change) is used to group or identify a population. Sometimes only one specific SNP can be used to characterize a complete, ancient population group.
There are tens of thousands of SNP's per chomosome that get tested for. For example,
23andMe tests the most at nearly 1 million SNP's across all the DNA mentioned here.
The
National Geographic Genographic Project Gene 2.0 is the most extensive Y-DNA SNP test available. Otherwise,
FamilyTreeDNA has allowance to purchase specific marker tests or small groups of markers to be tested. Amazingly,
23andMe includes all the chromosomes, including the Y, in their basic (SNP) testing. Almost any Y-DNA SNP marker is available in their raw results if you learn how to look for it.
mtDNA (SNP)
Female-lines, not as easily tracked due to the traditional loss of identity in marriage, can be tracked via Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) SNP markers similar to males. mtDNA testing results are not as conclusive as Y-STR for nearer term, genealogical studies. An exact match in the HVR1, HVR2 and Coding Region means there is a 50% chance you are related in the last 5 generations. Or 95% in last 22 generations or 550 years. HVR1 and HVR2 look at the ends of the strand. The Coding Region is the rest of the strand in between and, if tested also, gives a complete characterization of your mtDNA strand. See
mtDNA FAQ for more information.
For mtDNA testing, instead of reporting on specific marker "length" values like in STR, only reports of those SNP's different from a base standard are made. To be most accurate in your comparison to find a possible genealogical "cousin", you need to have only the same difference markers and their tested difference values match. This is the same for Y-SNP testing but often they only use a single marker result to determine a Haplogroup sub-clade population.
Because mtDNA is smaller, some may do a full sequencing of the mtDNA. But this is more uncommon and usually costly.
Autosomal
There is a third form of testing that is gaining in popularity and accuracy. The Autosomal DNA (atDNA) test looks at all the non-sex DNA chromosomes. It tests SNP's across all the rest of the 44+ chromosomes.
The controversy and confusion comes because even siblings will appear very different. This is because you get half the genes from your mother and half from your father. The previous tests would be identical between siblings (unless a change was introduced that generation for a particular sibling). So in autosomal, which mix of chromosomes you get from each parent is pretty random and arbitrary. It is possible for two siblings to get the opposite half from each parent; although highly unlikely. Only identical twins share the same DNA and thus get the identical mixture from each parent. The more generations separated (cousin distance), the smaller possible percentage of your DNA from the common ancestor. Within 5 generations, it can be very small on average.
FamilyTreeDNA's
FamilyFinder is essentially an Autosomal test.
23andMe is providing SNP testing across all your DNA and even provides the most comprehensive number of SNP's tested.
This is an emerging study area at the genealogical level. But there is some success if you get a large number of close relatives to test. Autosomal testing is more commonly used for looking at medical conditions and traits. Just as specific SNP's get identified with a population (or Haplogroup), specific SNP's in autosomal chromosomes are found to characterize medical conditions and traits. This field is rapidly evolving just as it is for population (Haplogroup) studies.
What happened to the X Chromosome?
23andMe includes X-SNP testing in their overal (SNP) results. Meaning, they test and report on all DNA. Maternal lineage is done with Mitochondrial DNA and not the X chromosome. Females usually get an X strand from both of their parents.
Summary of Genealogical Testing
STR's are the most accurate, genealogical time (<500 years) testing for descendants from common ancestors. Unfortunately, only the Y-chromosome has identified STR's and thus
only male lines can be tested for. Hence the prevalence of surname projects in the European and derived populations using male surname progression.
SNP's are much more infrequent and thus used for greater-than genealogical time (1,00's to tens of 1,000's of years) understanding.
Haplogroups or population studies; especially with Y-DNA and mtDNA to characterize male-only and female-only progression.
SNP's in autosomal chromosomes are used for identifying genetically-inherited traits and tendency's towards medical conditions. In a very
non-definitive way, they can be used to find near-term cousins. But this latter field is one where mathematical Chaos Theory would likely lead to improvements in analysis — it is very random and improbable as two siblings can look completely unrelated except in their mtDNA.
Autosomal STR testing is only used in criminal analysis and databases and thus not available for near term, non-male-line-only relationship testing. And like Autosomal SNP testing, there is a certain understanding of statistical probability involved as you inherit autosomal genes from both parents.
To the extent that genetic traits are associated with specific populations, autosomal SNP's can be used to look for indicators of populations as well. Like with population studies and medical traits, this is a rapidly evolving and developing area.
Other Genealogical DNA Resources
[-]Original intro and purpose of this page
[+]
The work here is more inclusive than a single family now because of the popular and successful use that can come with DNA testing to correctly determine paternal lineage when surnames changed so often. Traditional research through documents has hit a dead end in many cases. So all possible lines and spelling variations have to be researched and DNA testing used to supplement and confirm or deny information.
This page was started as there was just no clue or evidence to Peter Horr's (b.1819 Ohio) parents and lineage. The page collected general information about family lines based on his surname. We have since learned a lot more and are honing in on one or two families as likely parentage for Peter. So, much like done for
MyCuz,:::::.us/Jesse+Harr+Ancestry" rel="external">Jesse Harr
earlier to find his parents,
Peter Horr's story and specifics are now in a separate page with this one page left to general, family line research notes. The DNA testing gave us our first true hint by showing a strong link to Hezekiah Hoar's line.
Many researching the United States lineage of the surnames listed here are surprised to find that their surname changed; often more than once. Around 1900, as well as in the 1700's, it was common to find changes in the surname spelling as families became more established, written records more important, and pronunciation from written forms become more important. This page documents the lineage research for the various surnames in use today in the United States as has been discovered or derived and linked back to the earliest uses. See also the
Surname Progression page for the spread of these surnames in the United States.
Hoar is the name in use upon immigration to North America in 1630's by two well researched families when thousands of Puritans came from Southwest England to seek freedom from persecution. Earlier English variations of the surname in use were
Hore from around 1300 to 1600 and possibly
le Hore earlier back to 1000. Descendants in America seem to have most commonly changed the name, if at all, to
Hoare,
Hoard, or
Horr. There are even further changes more recently from those to
Shorr and
Harr, for example. Those remaining in Britain often changed to
Orr or
Oar as the
H was silent. If anything, we hope to develop a chart showing name progression by century and location to possibly help others in their quest for history.
Spelling Progression
Here we try to identify name changes and some of the story around them.
This particular surname seems to have many more changes than expected; given it originated and remained in the English language. Lore says most often spouses of males made the change. So the change is most often seen at the time of marriage and applied to the whole family; husband included. A reason given by some is due to the confusion with the English word "Whore" in both spelling and pronunciation. Lets face it, without the silent
H or pronounced like
Harr, this is often the first pronunciation attempt when viewing the written form of most variations. No matter what the case, we try to document the changes here and give examples of when it occurred.
- Hore to Hoar: By Hezekiah Hoar upon arrival in the New World, it appears. But also preferred by his branch in Devonshire.
- Hoar to Oar: Based on the belief by many that the original H in the surname was silent, this is simply changing the spelling to represent the pronunciation. Some variations like Orr as well. Primarily in England.
- Horr to Harr: We see many records in the 1800's using both spellings but with the letter O variant most predominant. Around 1900, as records become more fixed, written and common for all people (not just prominent, land owners), some change the name to use the letter A always. Many with the letter O still today pronounce the name more like Haw as in saw. So the change to the letter A may simply be trying to stick to a more phonetic spelling based on pronunciation. In the original authors instance, it is known the name was changed at marriage by the wife who did not want the name as written.
- Jesse Horr/Harr, born 1879 in Astoria, Fulton County, Illinois
- Hoar to Hoard and Howard: Hoard being a common one early on in Hezekiah Hoar's line from Taunton, MA. Howard less common and more recent.
- Hoar to Hobart: An interesting, more drastic change that cannot simply be attributed to phonetic or pronunciation differences. This is an explicit attempt to change the name yet keep much of the original. By inserting two consonants at two different places, a completely different surname with nor real apparent relation to the original occurs. But still much closer than simply changing to a completely different surname with no relation. Clever.
- Lewis Dwight Hoar/Hobart, born 1817 in New York, USA
West Europeans started using surnames and the practice of male descendants taking the fathers surname hundreds of years ago. It is somewhat a fluke if one thinks about it. In just five generations, an individual has 2^5 or 32 grandparents. But only one of those 32 is the source of the surname (or possibly none if you married and took your husbands surname as has been convention). So surname line is such a small part of someone's heritage as it really only tracks the male progression. But, of course, that "male" tracking has meant everything for thousands of years until very recent times in mainly Western cultures.
Pronunciation
It has been indicated (ref?) that the English name used a
silent H in the pronunciation. Hence why some changed to the variant without the H we presume. Others pronounced it like
Haw or
Saw and thus likely why we see the change to Horr and Harr; especially in 1900 as written records become more prevalent.
[This whole section needs research and lots of references]